Showing posts with label The Social Gospel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Social Gospel. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

One World Religion - Here we come .....

By Brannon S. Howse

To be "Loving" now means you embrace ecumenicalism and don't divide on theological and doctrinal issues for success in the culture war and you embrace a social gospel. Will this be the message we hear at Glenn Beck's Restoring Love Rally on 7-28-12 in Dallas?

If you don't agree with Beck's spiritual agenda will that make you a bigot? In 2010 I was quoted in a CNN article on why Christians should not unite in a spiritual enterprise with a New Age Mormon to win the "culture war." Beck talked about the article on his radio program and said, "so now the religious bigotry is there too". I wrote about Beck's comment in a column back in 2010.
Beck's rally will center on a three day event of "Celebration of Service". I believe Beck is really pushing a social gospel agenda along with his ecumenicalism. Recently Beck's website announced his global plan which included a visit to the Vatican. Therefore, may I suggest Rick Warren be a keynote speaker at Beck's rally so Warren can talk about his global Peace Plan, the social gospel, and his ecumenicalism. After all, Rick Warren has proven he can work with Muslims so why not a Mormon? After all there are a lot of similarities between Mormons and Muslims. A few years ago Warren signed the Yale document that declared that Christians and Muslims worship the same god. The document declared:
We applaud that A Common Word Between Us and You stresses so insistently the unique devotion to one God, Muslims and Christians do not worship the same god. Glenn Beck, like Warren, is also pushing a social gospel agenda along with ecumenicalism. Beck's website states:
"Glenn Beck will be reaching out to individual organizations, churches, and more across the area and ask them the question: 'If you had unlimited manpower for one day – what would you do?'…I have said enough words. It's time for me to help hold up the arms of community and faith leaders and serve those who are doing the heavy lifting on healing our nation…It is time to deemphasize the political solution and first demand real change in ourselves."
So Beck is going to rally the churches and faith leaders and Beck is going to help hold up the arms of the faith community?
If Beck is going to deemphasize the political solution that really only leaves a spiritual solution and thus the desire to work with the churches. Are you interested in in the spiritual solutions of a New Age Mormon? I for one am not. Christians should not unite with Beck in spiritual enterprise as declared in Romans 16:17, 2 John 9-11, Ephesians 5:11, and 2 Corinthians 6:14.
Beck's social gospel, ecumenicalism, and global plan seem very similar to that of Rick Warren. In the December 20, 2011 Orange County Register it was reported that Rick Warren is opening the PEACE Center as part of his global PEACE Plan. I believe Warren's PEACE plan is really a communitarian philosophy of bringing together the church, corporations and the government for what Warren has called the three-legged stool.
The Irvine woman is one of about 72,000 people who have benefitted from Saddleback's food pantry since its 2009 opening, according to Saddleback officials. The pantry is one of several services that will be part of the church's new PEACE Center.
The OCR reported:
A permanent larger, two-story structure is in the planning stages. It will house a free health clinic, clothing exchange, warehouse and auto-repair shop in addition to services being offered at the temporary center. So far, $600,000 has been raised through donations toward the $2 million cost of the structure.
In the OCR Warren was quoted as saying:
"This is not for members of Saddleback but for people in the community," he said. "When the final building is built, it will be the first thing people see when they come to the campus. It's not about the church but the hope and love that's in that building."
Nowhere in the New Testament Church description of the church do we see the mandate for the corporate church to focus on social programs for those outside the church. While this could be a ministry for individuals as a platform for preaching the Biblical gospel, it is not a function described in the Bible as a calling of the New Testament Church. The New Testament church is to equip and train its members for the work of ministry-the preaching of the gospel.
Pastor Jesse Johnson put it best when he wrote:
There is a very real danger that has been played out through history repeatedly, that when churches embrace a vision for combating poverty, evangelism is one of the first victims of this altered commission…To guard against that, the church is never commanded to show compassion to the poor as a means for expanding the kingdom. Simply put, you owe the poor the gospel; Jesus died to purchase for them the privilege of hearing the testimony of his death and resurrection (1 Tim 2:6). That is both the most and the least you can give, and Robin Hood ethics do not overlap with the Great Commission.
The most loving thing Christians can do is reject the social gospel and preach the Biblical gospel to a lost world. The most loving things Christians can do is expose false teachers and their false teaching. While these Biblical mandates may be declared hateful by those committed to a social gospel, false teaching, and ecumenicalism, it is not. In Revelation 2:15 God declares his hatred of false teaching. A hatred for and not rallying around false teaching, the social gospel, and ecumenicalism is a hallmark of those that love God with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Emergent Church - Part 3/3

Chapter 7 - Undefining Knowledge - The Epistemology of the EC (PGS 135-156)
  • EPISTEMOLOGY: Theory of Knowledge
  • addresses the following questions:
  • What is knowledge?
  • How is knowledge acquired?
  • EMERGENT CHURCH EPISTEMOLOGY
  • rejection of absolutes and a world of cause and effect
  • believe in a socially constructed world in which our beliefs create the "worlds" in which we live.
  • "Coherentism"
  • BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN EPISTEMOLOGY
  • knowledge of salvation and reconciliation is revealed in the Bible.
  • Scripture is foundational for knowledge of salvation, of God, and of the world in which we live.

Chapter 8 - Undefining the Kingdom of God (pgs 157-178)

  • THE EC "KINGDOM of GOD"
  • equals joining God and building an earthly paradise now
  • logical conclusion when looking at their eschatology
  • all things are coming together in a future paradise
  • repackaged Liberalism through the Social Gospel and Mystical Spirituality
  • people must find a way to make this world a better place while waiting for it to be perfected as they move forward toward a future paradise.
  • THE BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN "KINGDOM of GOD"
  • The king will return to judge the disobedient
  • He is a threat to all who do not obey the laws or commandments
  • reward and blessing for those who believe in Him

Chapter 9 - Emergence Theory: The Philosophical Source of Emergent Theology (pgs 179-181)

  • Jurgen Moltmann plus Ken Wilber = EMERGENT
  • Moltmann; Emergent source of eschatology
  • Wilber; Emergent source of philosophy
  • Wilber's Philosophy - The Mystical Darwin
  • Upward Spiral - everything is evolving into something better
  • Holistic (spiritual and physical) concept of evolution
  • Spiral Dynamics - the world evolves into a physical / spiritual paradise over time.
  • Who is Ken Wilber?
  • neo-Buddhist
  • Philosophy = pagan and Christian concepts into one unified spirituality
  • created his own language that works with his ideas and concepts
  • has his roots in Hegel
  • The EC ... nothing special or unique
  • rejection of Scripture
  • looked at Hegel as its prophet
  • EXAMPLE - The Mormon Church - rejected scripture and looked to Joseph Smith as its prophet.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Emergent Church - Part 1/3

The Emergent Church: Undefining Christianity - by Bob DeWaay
Chapter One - The Road to Paradise Imagined (pgs 13-30)
  • Acts 17:30, 31 - The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.
  • Acts 17:30, 31 speak(s) of a literal and future judgment - this notion is rejected by the EC.
  • God's words (inspired scripture) are not used as logical boundaries for humanity in the eyes of the EC
  • Bedrock of Belief System = ESCHATOLOGY
  • The EC has a "hopeful and positive view of God's engagement in the world."
  • God is the future, drawing everything to himself
  • God is still creating and we can be "co-creators" of the world with God.
  • Post-Modern Framework (Deconstruct Christianity)
  • No definitions; that creates categories
  • Categories involve Boundaries
  • Boundaries keep people out
  • Theology of "HOPE" versus Theology of "DESPAIR"
  • Francis Schaeffer (theology of despair): people are despaired because they had no hope of knowing the truth about God, about man, and about the universe.
  • Jurgen Moltmann (theology of hope): based upon the philosophies of Georg Hegel - a Marxist Idealist.
  • Hegel Philosophy: deny absolutes, consider that everything evolves, incompatible opposites - such as good and evil, combine for an improved 3rd option - "The Third Way".
  • Moltmann applied philosophies of Hegel to theology and eschatology.
  • Instead of judgment (no consideration of scripture) the entire world was evolving towards paradise - leaving evil behind ... Theology of Hope.
  • Theology of Hope is based upon the idea that history is not in the direction of divine judgment, but is headed toward the "Kingdom of God" on earth with universal participation.
  • Humanity cannot know that is true until the future
  • The Holy Bible is NOT viewed as the inerrant word of God
  • The EC DENIES that we can know what the Holy Bible really means.
  • All of this captures the Post-Modern attitude
  • Emergent / Post-Modern Philosophy
  • denies the objectivity of 1) Historic Knowledge and 2) Present Knowledge
  • but asserts the objectivity of 1) Future Knowledge

Chapter Two - Undefining God's Mission (pgs 31-50)

  • EMERGENT MISSION (tends to undefined and EC leaders are in disagreement)
  • Improve society now
  • They borrow their beliefs/practices from Catholic Liberalism
  • Christianity's mission is to make the world a tangible "paradise now"
  • The term "MISSIONAL" describes the idea that any works that make the world a better place brings humanity toward the ideal future.
  • Missional for the EC is to find a more generous 3rd Way - not liberal, not conservative
  • Anything that makes the world a better place is a worthy mission - the only mission that DOES NOT make sense is the preaching of repentance for the forgiveness of sins so that humanity can avoid a literal, future judgment.
  • The EC is trying to help God's dreams come true
  • The EC embraces the "SOCIAL GOSPEL"
  • The individual/person on the mission determines its meaning - not the Bible
  • Saving planet earth is essential
  • The Cross: there is no clear meaning regarding the cross or the resurrection. Therefore, the "mission" is undefined and must be discovered.
  • SPECIFICALLY DENY: a mission of proclaiming and escape from God's coming wrath - the EC DOES NOT believe in a pending future judgment.
  • BIBLICAL MISSION (gotta be fair and balanced these days)
  • Preach and Teach the Gospel / spread the "Good News" of Jesus Christ
  • Why is it such good news? - because it provides us sinners with a certain escape from the wrath of God

Chapter Three - Undefining Christian Thinking (pgs 51-72)

  • 2 Timothy 3:7 - always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth.
  • The EC holds to the position that it is absurd to believe that an author's words can convey the thoughts that he intends the reader to understand. Therefore, the reader is free to give whatever meaning he/she desires to the authors words.
  • The emphasis for the EC is on experience(s)
  • "Words don't have meaning ... experiences do"
  • Spiritual experiences in a group setting are what lead to "Christian" thinking
  • The EC EMBRACE MYSTICISM - truth is experienced rather than understood.
  • This belief allows the EC and its followers to have liberation from the restraints of definition(s)
  • The definitions are from flawed, narrow-minded Christian theologians
  • The EC reject propositional truth and embrace religious existentialism - they do not want the conversation to "divide" humanity.
  • The EC REJECT theological methods that make any type of distinction
  • Agreement vs Disagreement
  • Win vs Loss
  • Good vs Bad
  • Orthodoxy vs Heresy